« Previous • Post 19,295 of 32,712 • Next »
Subject: Re: consensus on valve lash setting
--part1_1d0.fb17323.2c7ad7a5_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Where did you get these numbers? Just wondering...Greg '74 LAPD --part1_1d0.fb17323.2c7ad7a5_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">Where did you get these numbers? Just wondering...Greg '74 LAPD</FONT></HTML> --part1_1d0.fb17323.2c7ad7a5_boundary--
Entire thread:
consensus on valve lash setting | Allan Johnson
RE: consensus on valve lash setting | Helge Christensen
Re: consensus on valve lash setting | gr-@tonedeaftouring.com
Re: consensus on valve lash setting | andy hill
Re: consensus on valve lash setting | Allan Johnson
consensus on valve lash setting | Prusnek
RE: consensus on valve lash setting | Charlie Mullendore
RE: consensus on valve lash setting | Ray Hale
Re: consensus on valve lash setting | gr-@tonedeaftouring.com
Re: consensus on valve lash setting | Grvd-@aol.com
Re: consensus on valve lash setting | GUZZI-@aol.com
Re: consensus on valve lash setting | GUZZI-@aol.com
Re: consensus on valve lash setting | Allan Johnson
RE: consensus on valve lash setting | SWal-@ca.imshealth.com