Subject: Re: Digest for Loopfram-@topica.com, issue 1160
Author: PEHA-@aol.com
Date: May 10, 2003, 4:30 PM
Post ID: 1712943430
--part1_de.3880d7fd.2beee5a1_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 05/09/2003 7:34:24 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
mjon-@yahoo.com writes:
| Of course, the part about the gap is not likely to happen. That is exactly why one times to both cylinders. |
Huh? And why can't I accurately set the gap for the left cylinder? Its just
a matter of friction feel with the guage. Why would my precision be any
better for the other side? Same guage, same points, same feelee.
Patrick
--part1_de.3880d7fd.2beee5a1_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 05/09/2003 7:34:24 PM Pacific Daylight Time, mjon-@yahoo.com writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Of course, the part about the gap is not likely to<BR>
happen. That is exactly why one times to both<BR>
cylinders.</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
Huh? And why can't I accurately set the gap for the left cylinder? Its just a matter of friction feel with the guage. Why would my precision be any better for the other side? Same guage, same points, same feelee.<BR>
<BR>
Patrick</FONT></HTML>
--part1_de.3880d7fd.2beee5a1_boundary--