Subject: Re: Progressive fork spring
Author: Matt Moore
Date: Sep 5, 2002, 5:20 PM
Post ID: 1710954138
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0062_01C25519.7A10A610
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
It shouldn't matter because the softer spring will always compress first, then as you compress more, the rate increases because you are pushing against the higher strength spring. The only way it would matter is if the top and bottom mountings were different sizes (dia).
------=_NextPart_000_0062_01C25519.7A10A610
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>It shouldn't matter because the softer spring will
always compress first, then as you compress more, the rate increases
because you are pushing against the higher strength spring. The only way it
would matter is if the top and bottom mountings were different sizes
(dia).</FONT></DIV>
</BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0062_01C25519.7A10A610--