Subject: retorque heads
Author: scott kelso
Date: Mar 5, 2001, 5:56 PM
Post ID: 1705735350
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C0A5B6.FA67A020
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Question,when retorqueing heads,is it correct to loosen then retighten.I =
understand that static friction is greater than kinetic =
friction?Also,should valve clearances be set adding +.002 to specs.until =
fresh motor is broken in and head gasket finally stops crushing thinner =
?Thanks Scott K
73 eldo
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C0A5B6.FA67A020
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Question,when retorqueing heads,is =
it correct to=20
loosen then retighten.I understand that static friction is greater than =
kinetic=20
friction?Also,should valve clearances be set adding +.002 to specs.until =
fresh=20
motor is broken in and head gasket finally stops crushing thinner =
?Thanks Scott=20
K</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>73 eldo</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C0A5B6.FA67A020--